MOTS-c improves Vo2max

Status
Not open for further replies.

GreenOlives

GLP-1 Novice 🚫No Source Discussion🚫
Member Since
Feb 4, 2026
Posts
14
Likes Received
6
Location
Ireland
I just heard this on a podcast yesterday. Any runners out there using it?
 
According to my Fitbit, My vo2 max increase from 39- to 42 without any increase in my running since I started using the MOTS-C.

I’m not much of a runner, I just run 2 miles everyday for the last 30 months.
 
No idea on my VO2 max as I dont have a power meter on my bike. But on a route I usually average 12.8mph in zone 2 hr. Before the judging, at the end there is a long slow climb thay kills my average speed lol.

Anyways took 5mg MOTSC prior to last ride and averaged 14mph with similar wind, temp, etc. One off example, but next few rides will determine if one off or the norm with MOTSC.
 
Turbo-Farmer said:
According to my Fitbit, My vo2 max increase from 39- to 42 without any increase in my running since I started using the MOTS-C.

I’m not much of a runner, I just run 2 miles everyday for the last 30 months.
Lol my 63 yo brother in law missed 1 day of running in like 7 years....effin terminator.
 
It’s banned by the WADA

Anti-Doping Status

As of the 2025 and 2026 WADA Prohibited Lists, MOTS-c is explicitly classified under Section S4: Hormone and Metabolic Modulators.

• Category: S4.4.1 — Activators of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK).

• Prohibition: It is banned both in-competition and out-of-competition.

• Reasoning: Because MOTS-c acts as a "metabolic shield" and exercise mimetic, it can artificially enhance endurance, glucose metabolism, and fatty acid oxidation, providing an unfair performance advantage similar to other metabolic modulators like GW501516 (Cardarine).
 
GreenOlives said:
I just heard this on a podcast yesterday. Any runners out there using it?
From a look on google scholar, there have not ever been human studies of mots-c as a treatment. Lots of studies measuring its levels in various states and conditions, and lots of studies of giving it to rats or mice but none to humans I can find. If you have a reference to where the info came from I would like to see it.
 
lessthanhalf said:
From a look on google scholar, there have not ever been human studies of mots-c as a treatment. Lots of studies measuring its levels in various states and conditions, and lots of studies of giving it to rats or mice but none to humans I can find. If you have a reference to where the info came from I would like to see it.

ClinicalTrials.gov

clinicaltrials.gov

A phase 2 trial is currently underway
 
Thanks, no results yet unfortunately. There should have been a phase 1 of this but I cannot find it. Not everything gets published.
 
Turbo-Farmer said:
According to my Fitbit, My vo2 max increase from 39- to 42 without any increase in my running since I started using the MOTS-C.

I’m not much of a runner, I just run 2 miles everyday for the last 30 months.
I'm not a runner at all. I used to run to dinner, but not anymore. One thing I have noticed that supports this theory is what I feel at altitude. When "running" Mots-C I notice that living at 7000' has a much smaller effect on me. I can go up 3 flights of stairs with little effect on my breathing and my recovery is just a few seconds, I don't do that when I'm not using it. I've also noticed that my resistance training is stronger and I can do 10-15 more reps than I can on off days. Something on those days has changed and I think vo2 max explains it.
 
I just started a 5mg dose 3x/week (Mon-Wed-Fri) preworkout last week and it can definitely make you a little light-headed as you push harder with it's "boost".
 
I started using 2.5 mg 3x a week on my 7+ mile runs and it seems to really help but have only done 4 so far.
 
I’m a trail runner, I do a 5k track with 1000’ of gain, since I’ve introduced mots-c I’ve been not only pr’ing my runs but I’ve been crushing my CrossFit WODs everyday, I feel like a beast on this stuff! Just checked my stats, looks like it’s pretty consistent with when I started taking mots-c lol
 
lessthanhalf said:
Thanks, no results yet unfortunately. There should have been a phase 1 of this but I cannot find it. Not everything gets published.
MOTS-c was called CB4211:

Calm Logic said:
In the phase 1 clinical trial of MOTS-c, the subq ISRs were one reason they didn't go forward, but they were doing a whopping 25 mg per day. But " no serious adverse events " from subq injections (pharma grade, not grey). It was a very small study (N=11).
 
sidroponix said:
I’m a trail runner, I do a 5k track with 1000’ of gain, since I’ve introduced mots-c I’ve been not only pr’ing my runs but I’ve been crushing my CrossFit WODs everyday, I feel like a beast on this stuff! Just checked my stats, looks like it’s pretty consistent with when I started taking mots-c lol
is that your vo2 max chart? what protocol are you using?
 
Is there any actual scientific evidence supporting the claim that MOTS-C increases VO2 max? or are we just discussing what someone heard someone say on some podcast?

is there even a proposed mechanism for this?

According to medical literature it increases glucose uptake, which can plainly account for pr'ing on runs
 
exxige said:
is that your vo2 max chart? what protocol are you using?
It is my chart…I’m using 2mg mots-c 3x/wk and tirz 12.5mg 1x/week. I run my mountain 4-7days/week plus CrossFit 5x/wk
 
wildweasel said:
Is there any actual scientific evidence supporting the claim that MOTS-C increases VO2 max? or are we just discussing what someone heard someone say on some podcast?

is there even a proposed mechanism for this?

According to medical literature it increases glucose uptake, which can plainly account for pr'ing on runs
The short answer is no, there is no direct evidence that mots-c increases vo2 in humans. Claiming this on existing evidence is definite overreach. The only human studies that exist on its development name ( or modified version of it ) of cb4211 was a phase 1 study where it was not toxic and may reduce liver fat. There is a phase 2 study in progress. Given that it is supposed to be an exerkine, or an exercise mimicking hormone of sorts it is possible that it does, it does increase exercise tolerance in rodents, but I do not think they measured vo2 in those studies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,620
Messages
55,146
Members
1
Latest member
Admin
Back
Top