GreenOlives
GLP-1 Novice 🚫No Source Discussion🚫
I just heard this on a podcast yesterday. Any runners out there using it?



Lol my 63 yo brother in law missed 1 day of running in like 7 years....effin terminator.Turbo-Farmer said:According to my Fitbit, My vo2 max increase from 39- to 42 without any increase in my running since I started using the MOTS-C.
I’m not much of a runner, I just run 2 miles everyday for the last 30 months.


From a look on google scholar, there have not ever been human studies of mots-c as a treatment. Lots of studies measuring its levels in various states and conditions, and lots of studies of giving it to rats or mice but none to humans I can find. If you have a reference to where the info came from I would like to see it.GreenOlives said:I just heard this on a podcast yesterday. Any runners out there using it?

lessthanhalf said:From a look on google scholar, there have not ever been human studies of mots-c as a treatment. Lots of studies measuring its levels in various states and conditions, and lots of studies of giving it to rats or mice but none to humans I can find. If you have a reference to where the info came from I would like to see it.

I'm not a runner at all. I used to run to dinner, but not anymore. One thing I have noticed that supports this theory is what I feel at altitude. When "running" Mots-C I notice that living at 7000' has a much smaller effect on me. I can go up 3 flights of stairs with little effect on my breathing and my recovery is just a few seconds, I don't do that when I'm not using it. I've also noticed that my resistance training is stronger and I can do 10-15 more reps than I can on off days. Something on those days has changed and I think vo2 max explains it.Turbo-Farmer said:According to my Fitbit, My vo2 max increase from 39- to 42 without any increase in my running since I started using the MOTS-C.
I’m not much of a runner, I just run 2 miles everyday for the last 30 months.


MOTS-c was called CB4211:lessthanhalf said:Thanks, no results yet unfortunately. There should have been a phase 1 of this but I cannot find it. Not everything gets published.
Calm Logic said:In the phase 1 clinical trial of MOTS-c, the subq ISRs were one reason they didn't go forward, but they were doing a whopping 25 mg per day. But " no serious adverse events " from subq injections (pharma grade, not grey). It was a very small study (N=11).
is that your vo2 max chart? what protocol are you using?sidroponix said:I’m a trail runner, I do a 5k track with 1000’ of gain, since I’ve introduced mots-c I’ve been not only pr’ing my runs but I’ve been crushing my CrossFit WODs everyday, I feel like a beast on this stuff! Just checked my stats, looks like it’s pretty consistent with when I started taking mots-c lol

It is my chart…I’m using 2mg mots-c 3x/wk and tirz 12.5mg 1x/week. I run my mountain 4-7days/week plus CrossFit 5x/wkexxige said:is that your vo2 max chart? what protocol are you using?

The short answer is no, there is no direct evidence that mots-c increases vo2 in humans. Claiming this on existing evidence is definite overreach. The only human studies that exist on its development name ( or modified version of it ) of cb4211 was a phase 1 study where it was not toxic and may reduce liver fat. There is a phase 2 study in progress. Given that it is supposed to be an exerkine, or an exercise mimicking hormone of sorts it is possible that it does, it does increase exercise tolerance in rodents, but I do not think they measured vo2 in those studies.wildweasel said:Is there any actual scientific evidence supporting the claim that MOTS-C increases VO2 max? or are we just discussing what someone heard someone say on some podcast?
is there even a proposed mechanism for this?
According to medical literature it increases glucose uptake, which can plainly account for pr'ing on runs