tendency
GLP-1 Enthusiast

Yes, agree and this is all mostly accurate, IMO. However, none of this equates to Seeds being a quack.hexagonal said:Minimal to no solid science behind their claims. We just have basically no studies supporting most of what they say this stuff does. We'll see mechanistic studies in animals held up as a reason (but look at how that turned out for AOD), some reported anecdotes, etc., but most of the effects they talk about are the sort of thing that is very placebo susceptible.
Meanwhile they have significant financial incentive to sell you on the idea this stuff does a lot. Books, affiliations with peptide companies and clinics, etc.
I'd take their claims with a grain of salt.
He's got a very impressive clinical track record and certainly know the peptide field, far better I would hazard, than almost anyone on this site, lol.
Having said that, yes, I've found he misspeaks in his knowledge and sometimes will argue both sides of a subject and he certainly has his agenda - he is in Beverly Hills after all! But, there's also alot of gold in what he says as well. I would not simply dismiss his knowledge base as quackery. That's my .02 cents, anyhow.
