
CJC and Tesamorelin do not require close tracking of your insulin levels the way that HGH does.birdwhacker said:CJC/Ipa is fine and of course there aren't really any reasons to choose either of the secretagogues over HGH.

CJC and Tesamorelin do not require close tracking of your insulin levels the way that HGH does.birdwhacker said:CJC/Ipa is fine and of course there aren't really any reasons to choose either of the secretagogues over HGH.

True, but GLPs already tackle this, and you can always add berberine and cut back on your carbs.bogardbilla said:CJC and Tesamorelin do not require close tracking of your insulin levels the way that HGH does.
Lobster HGH getting very high praise in multiple forums based on the test results!!MTSpace said:Better than TRT? Do you have a good source for HGH that has good testing before I test? I bought some but will need to send off for testing. The source Inno had Jano test batch @ 96% but no dimer testing. I would like 97/98% with little to low dimer.

Makes dents in what? I used to use adipose regularly.lastresort said:Have you actually tried adipotide? I have not found many personal accounts, but one person whom I talked to told me it makes dents.
Not adipose. That's fat. He is talking about adipotide, a peptide. He is saying it might make bent/dents in our flesh.FlowerFairy said:adipose

I know he was talking about adipotide. As I said, I took it for a long time. No dents here.Smiter said:Not adipose. That's fat. He is talking about adipotide, a peptide. He is saying it might make bent/dents in our flesh.

Ugh, just realized freaking spellcheck messed me over. I don’t use adipose.FlowerFairy said:I know he was talking about adipotide. As I said, I took it for a long time. No dents here.
hey thats cool. Did it work?FlowerFairy said:I know he was talking about adipotide. As I said, I took it for a long time. No dents here.

quoted said:Adipotide targets specific receptors—prohibitin and annexin A2—on the endothelial cells of blood vessels that feed white fat. By disrupting this supply, it causes fat cell death.

I used 4.53mcg/lb- my dose changed with my weight. I didn’t see any sides, but I pushed water and electrolytes to minimize my risk. It was when I was first starting out, so I was losing pretty quickly. This was also before all the news about the bodybuilder who killed his kidneys with high doses.. when that hit I took a break, one because I couldn’t find it for a while, two because I figured I should take a break (I used it for 4 months).lastresort said:I mean if it makes no dent that is fine.
What dosage did you use? Did you see any side effects?

See above. It sure seemed to.Smiter said:hey thats cool. Did it work?
Yes, the fat cells still remain active.Smiter said:My main reason for choosing it was because so many folks here want to remain on GL-1s forever. Some have said that these fat cells might shrink but the body metabolism will remember its fat state. I'm sure adipocytes will definitely have a negative hormonal impact. The leptin resistance that I'm certain is connected to food noise, has to be influenced by adipocytes. If even an iota of fat cells could be permanently eliminated by adipotide, I thought it would be a good choice.
Yes, that's the info I was alluding to. It has long been a pet thesis of mine that leptin resistance is the start of it all, including insulin resistance. Since leptin is secreted by fat cells along with the stomach, the continued existence of adipocytes HAS to be treated as a vital target for phronetic and long-lasting weight loss.lastresort said:Yes, the fat cells still remain active.
I cant remember the name of the study but it reported that the fat cells still send hormonal signals, and when they "replenish", they became even more resistant.
In my ideal world, I would lose weight by diet and GLP, then do a full body liposuction to get rid of the fat cells forever.
exactly. This bit is imo, why yo-yo dieting is bad and why weight loss becomes harder as we get older.lastresort said:the fat cells still send hormonal signals, and when they "replenish", they became even more resistant.
I can't think of any peptide that would be better at maintaining your physique than retatrutide. Modify your dose based on your goals.RanHerOver said:Heyo!
Right now I am on retatrutide, going strong, and I am losing weight.
So far so good.
Thing is, after I reach my goal weight (I want my abs to show!!) I'd love to jump off of reta and maybe switch to a peptide that will help me maintain the new physique. Of course I will keep having a healthy diet focused mainly on protein, but if I had a peptide that might help me with muscle recovery and such... it might be pretty good for me. I read about CJC, but I am not sure.
So I'm asking here: after my cut phase, which peptide might be best for a good "bulk"? I don't want to look huge, but if there's something that can help me keep my muscle, I'm listening.
Interesting outlook. I would submit pEG MGF as the best peptide for a muscular physique.Habibibi said:I can't think of any peptide that would be better at maintaining your physique than retatrutide. Modify your dose based on your goals.

TIL about PEG-MGF, thank you!Smiter said:Interesting outlook. I would submit pEG MGF as the best peptide for a muscular physique.