我冒险尝试了LSPL。

Status
Not open for further replies.
EllenRipley said:
I ordered from Ava at LSPL on 2/22. Got my tracking number on 2/25. Received the delivery today, 2/28. Much faster than I expected.
5 days? Did it come from a USA warehouse?
 
Airborne Daddy said:
I believe 1 to 2 percent
So you have two tests from the same batch and the same lab and theirs a 1% or 2% degrade. Am I correct?
 
NUMBERS999 said:
5 days? Did it come from a USA warehouse?
CN. It shipped via DHL, and I was surprised it arrived as fast as it did. I placed a small order just to see how things would go with shipping. I really wanted to order from PGB but haven't figured out BC yet, so I took this route. This was a 1-time experience for me, and I am in no way suggesting everyone will have the same experience.
 
Nmc110662 said:
So you have two tests from the same batch and the same lab and theirs a 1% or 2% degrade. Am I correct?
Yes, I sent a vial for testing. Posted results earlier in this thread.
 
I did not see them that's why I was asking if both results were from the same lab. If you think about it two different vials a 1% difference is really minuscule I would think.
 
Fisherman2356 said:
how's this for you?

-86℃ (-112 ℉) Portable Ultra Low Temperature Freezer for Lab Samples Storage | eBay

About this item ULTRA LOW TEMPERATURE: Freezer can cool down to minus 86 Celcius (-123 °F) PORTABLE: Can be carried by one person, with external dimensions of 30.7x16.1x20.3 in (78x41x51 cm) 20L VOLUME: Interior chamber dimensions of 13.1x8.7x13.4 in (33x22x34 cm) THICK INSULATION: Dual door...

www.ebay.com
Not to steer too far away, but Jano recently stated that regular home freezers are fine. He said they have samples for over a decade. The main thing is keeping it below freezing.

His quote: "I don't think there's a reasonable amount of years that the peptides would go bad in the freezer."
 
CorncobCowboy said:
ok thanks for the heads up. I'll reach out again
@CorncobCowboy update please, helps us all. Did you get the product, or tracking #? Thanks,
 
Nmc110662 said:
So you have two tests from the same batch and the same lab and theirs a 1% or 2% degrade. Am I correct?
I have no tests. Someone had a test.
 
Nmc110662 said:
I did not see them that's why I was asking if both results were from the same lab. If you think about it two different vials a 1% difference is really minuscule I would think.
Sorry for the confusion here. I sent one vial off for testing. The results came back that the product was about 97% pure with what appears to be about 2% heat degradation. So, originally roughly 99% pure but about 2% was lost to (likely) heat degradation.
 
amawgmd said:
Sorry for the confusion here. I sent one vial off for testing. The results came back that the product was about 97% pure with what appears to be about 2% heat degradation. So, originally roughly 99% pure but about 2% was lost to (likely) heat degradation.
Did she microwave it before sending it your way or what, it's winter lol
 
The company ZZQ, whose tests LSPL has posted as theirs, popped up yesterday on Data Mining Site. I didn’t get too far down the rabbit hole, but they look to have the same price list, the same outdated tests, and shipping is the same.
 
BrowsingAbout said:
The company ZZQ, whose tests LSPL has posted as theirs, popped up yesterday on Data Mining Site. I didn’t get too far down the rabbit hole, but they look to have the same price list, the same outdated tests, and shipping is the same.
OUCH, too late for me. I just placed a fat order over $600 yesterday. Keep the bad news coming guys LOL
 
BrowsingAbout said:
The company ZZQ, whose tests LSPL has posted as theirs, popped up yesterday on Data Mining Site. I didn’t get too far down the rabbit hole, but they look to have the same price list, the same outdated tests, and shipping is the same.
LSPL is very upfront about ZZQ being a "subsidiary" (as they put it) of theirs. I'm not sure what their goal is in running the two identically, with no difference in product selection, pricing, target market of any discernible sort. But I wouldn't take it as a red flag.

Their understanding of the point to lab testing, the importance of clearly distinct numbered batches with distinct cap colors, and their posting of inappropriate CoAs) -- that's another story. I strongly suspect they have a false participant in the current third-party group tests and will violate 30-day secrecy rules to post the resulting CoA immediately. Those I'd take as red flags.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
4,434
Messages
86,405
Members
7,877
Latest member
jhonpdr
Back
Top