retarequired
GLP-1 Apprentice

MT1 and MT2. Yes I know MT1 is safer, I still don't want to mess with melanogenesis. No particular history or family risk.. just seems like trouble


Cu is one of the only tested peps with over 20 years of active researchsheilarae74 said:I don't see myself needing anything that isn't fat loss or body recomp related. I do want to try GHK-cu.

Wait, what? I wasn’t aware this was a thing. First I’m hearing.RuhRoRaggy said:PT-141
I’m not even sticking a needle in YOUR dick![]()

So...we need the tea. I got my mug at the ready. What is this dick-tide malarkey you speak of?RuhRoRaggy said:PT-141
I’m not even sticking a needle in YOUR dick![]()


Before I started buffering, I would get hard indurations from MOTS-C (and GHK-Cu) too. I am currently using dry-brushing, massage with arnica gel, red + near-IR light, and BPC/TB injected nearby to reduce the size of the fibrotic tissue. It's helping, but it's a slow process. If I didn't confound the variables...I'd actually know which one was helping. Maybe one of these methods can help you as well.randompersonrandom said:NAD+ did nothing positive that I could perceive, and it hurt and was a lot of volume, which grosses me out. MOTS-C hurt, MAY have granted some energy, but hurt and left lumps that remained for months (one of which is still there.)
I'll tolerate some hurt because I really do believe KLOW is doing SOMETHING. But if it hurts and doesn't seem to do anything for me, no thanks. And the MOTS-C leaving those for-way-too-long lumps was what made "and there's some risk to this" real for me.

I don't know though. The more I research, the more I find things that could solve my life problems.sheilarae74 said:I don't see myself needing anything that isn't fat loss or body recomp related. I do want to try GHK-cu.

DunningKruger said:Before I started buffering, I would get hard indurations from MOTS-C (and GHK-Cu) too. I am currently using dry-brushing, massage with arnica gel, red + near-IR light, and BPC/TB injected nearby to reduce the size of the fibrotic tissue. It's helping, but it's a slow process. If I didn't confound the variables...I'd actually know which one was helping. Maybe one of these methods can help you as well.![]()
Yeah. Um....I don't think PT-141 works like you think it works.RuhRoRaggy said:PT-141
I’m not even sticking a needle in YOUR dick![]()
women, and I mean female,she/her/hers, don't have dicks, LOL!!!RuhRoRaggy said:PT-141
I’m not even sticking a needle in YOUR dick![]()

AlexSilver said:From my notes:
LL37 - Never use - works as described but also causes massive inflammation on several levels, definitely causes and/or accelerates tumor growth, promotes histamine release, and exacerbates arthritis and skin conditions like psoriasis and eczema.

I think that assumption is too simplistic. Wanting to be “thin” is not the best frame; preserving a lean, strong physique is a better goal during weight loss.Brouette said:So, as a woman who want to be thin, the thing that I WONT try, its IPAMORELIN and all peptide who promote growing hormones and muscle mass growing. Maybe I am wrong, but I prefer loosing weight and after building my muscles?
Thank you for you answer! It complete, and you giving me the idea to try something new! Thank you again !!!DunningKruger said:I think that assumption is too simplistic. Wanting to be “thin” is not the best frame; preserving a lean, strong physique is a better goal during weight loss.
Peptides associated with growth signalling do not automatically make a woman bulky. That depends on the full context: dose, diet, training, genetics, and total energy balance.
If you’re on a GLP, I’d actually be more concerned about muscle loss than “bulking.” In that context, a GH secretagogue may help support lean mass retention, especially if protein intake is below 1g/lb of ideal body weight and resistance training is not in place.
I can say from personal experience that GH secretagogues do not automatically make a woman bulky. I eat 80–120 g of protein daily, have taken Tesa (1 mg) /Ipa (200 mcg) nightly this past quarter, and have been very satisfied with the results—lean, athletic, and far from bulky.
Included: last week’s DEXA and my smart scale data as a real-world example.

Gladly. I once thought the same thing. Now, I have a strong and capable body that I love, and Tesamorelin takes the #2 spot in my top 3 peptides.Brouette said:Thank you for you answer! It complete, and you giving me the idea to try something new! Thank you again !!!

Tummy works for meCandyCap said:Yeah. Um....I don't think PT-141 works like you think it works.

Don't tempt me.chmuse said:Tummy works for meBut now I want to know what would happen if someone did it. Would it work differently?

Not in a good way, lol.chmuse said:Would it work differently?
Gemini said:PT-141 Protocol Evaluation: Gender Response & Dosing Comparison
Feature Clinical Dose (1.75 mg) Microdose (0.5 mg – 1.0 mg) Target Population FDA-approved for premenopausal Women (HSDD). Preferred by Men and sensitive responders. Primary Mechanism High-level CNS receptor saturation. Threshold activation; avoids "over-stimulation." Response (Men) Often too intense. Prolonged erections (priapism risk). Natural responsiveness. Better control/timing. Response (Women) Standard for HSDD; triggers significant arousal signal. May be too subtle for some; depends on baseline drive. Side Effect Profile High Nausea/Flushing. Can last several hours. Minimal Nausea. Maintains the "mood boost." Dopamine/Mood Masked by physical distress or "flu-like" feeling. Clean mood lift. Focus, motivation, and "wanting." BP / Cardiovascular Notable transient spikes in blood pressure. Negligible impact for most healthy users.