This morning’s NYTimes: “Trump Weighs Crackdown on Medicines From China”

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grannuaile

GLP-1 Apprentice
Member Since
Nov 13, 2024
Posts
49
Likes Received
131
Location
USA
By Rob Copeland and Rebecca Robbins

Rob Copeland covers Wall Street. Rebecca Robbins covers pharmaceuticals.

Sept. 10, 2025, 5:00 a.m. ET

The Trump administration has been discussing severe restrictions on medicines from China that, if enacted, could upend the American pharmaceutical industry and availability of everything from generic drugs to cutting-edge treatments.

At the heart of the possible clampdown is a drafted executive order that threatens to cut off the pipeline of Chinese-invented experimental treatments. Major pharmaceutical companies have been buying the rights to drugs created in China for cancer, obesity, heart disease and Crohn’s disease.

The prospect of the order, a draft of which was obtained by The New York Times, has set off furious behind-the-scenes lobbying efforts by two diametrically opposed groups — each with billions of dollars at stake.

Prominent investors and corporate executives with close ties to the White House, including the tech billionaire Peter Thiel, the Google co-founder Sergey Brin, the Koch family and staff at the investment firm run by President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, have argued for a decisive crackdown against what they view as an existential threat by China to U.S. biotechnology, according to four people briefed on their lobbying who asked for anonymity to discuss private conversations.

. . .
 
It’s so weird having leadership with no stated, coherent policy platform or objectives. Makes it impossible to guess how they might go on these things. I am usually inclined to stress about peptide supply but this one I am calling a nothingburger until it gets more meat on it. My money is on it dragging out a long time for reasons I won’t state here for fear of it becoming a political argument unrelated to OPs news article.
 
ZippityDooDah said:
I stopped stressing over the things I can't control in the peptide space long ago in favor of focusing on things I can control like how many freezers to store my hoard I can plug into the same circuit before I have to hire an electrician.
I wonder how big of a ups I need for my little -40 freezer 🤔
 
byefatlicia said:
If things got bad, couldn't they ship first to another country so it wouldn't be coming from China?
I'm hearing of this practice being put into place now.
 
Peotidethrowaway said:
I mean I think this is targeting legitimate imports and not our sketchy Chinese shit
Yep. This is exactly why I’m confident gray will continuously persist.
 
Grannuaile said:
By Rob Copeland and Rebecca Robbins

Rob Copeland covers Wall Street. Rebecca Robbins covers pharmaceuticals.

Sept. 10, 2025, 5:00 a.m. ET

The Trump administration has been discussing severe restrictions on medicines from China that, if enacted, could upend the American pharmaceutical industry and availability of everything from generic drugs to cutting-edge treatments.

At the heart of the possible clampdown is a drafted executive order that threatens to cut off the pipeline of Chinese-invented experimental treatments. Major pharmaceutical companies have been buying the rights to drugs created in China for cancer, obesity, heart disease and Crohn’s disease.

The prospect of the order, a draft of which was obtained by The New York Times, has set off furious behind-the-scenes lobbying efforts by two diametrically opposed groups — each with billions of dollars at stake.

Prominent investors and corporate executives with close ties to the White House, including the tech billionaire Peter Thiel, the Google co-founder Sergey Brin, the Koch family and staff at the investment firm run by President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, have argued for a decisive crackdown against what they view as an existential threat by China to U.S. biotechnology, according to four people briefed on their lobbying who asked for anonymity to discuss private conversations.

. . .
This has nothing to do with our silly gray market peptides.
 
catdog said:
Gray. Ain’t. Going. Anywhere.
Ultimately, I agree.

Unfortunately, I think we're in for a period of increasingly frequent supply interruptions, longer shipping times, and price instability. As others have mentioned, it doesn't seem like this latest move is specifically targeting products related to our hobby, but IMHO there's little doubt they will still get caught up in the chaos to some degree.

In the end, the ingenuity behind the supply chains for certain products always manages to adapt, and while things may not look and work exactly like they do today, or last year, the products will always remain available.
 
ZippityDooDah said:
Ultimately, I agree.

Unfortunately, I think we're in for a period of increasingly frequent supply interruptions, longer shipping times, and price instability. As others have mentioned, it doesn't seem like this latest move is specifically targeting products related to our hobby, but IMHO there's little doubt they will still get caught up in the chaos to some degree.

In the end, the ingenuity behind the supply chains for certain products always manages to adapt, and while things may not look and work exactly like they do today, or last year, the products will always remain available.
Great perspective and take on the situation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,620
Messages
55,146
Members
1
Latest member
Admin
Back
Top