They Said Mixing Peptides Breaks Them — The Definitive Proof (You know you ALWAYS wanted to know the definitive answer, and here it is!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Camlbacker

GLP-1 Apprentice
Member Since
Nov 20, 2025
Posts
91
Likes Received
304
Location
Detroit
Like many of you, I've been watching the whole back and forth on social media about whether it's self-defeating to use a GLOW or KLOW blend versus pinning the individual peps. The great peptide guru Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer says you have to do one at a time, others say GLOW and KLOW are just fine. An argument can certainly be made for the dosing of GLOW and KLOW not being ideal for a highly individualized program; as I've been researching KLOW these last few weeks, I've come to respect this view, while also being ravenously desirous of not feeling like a human pin cushion day after fucking day. Injection fatigue is a thing, as many of us have come to know. I took a week off to wash out while traveling recently only to realize that, while the places I normally stick needles felt better, in general I've been happier and more enlightened when I was adhering to structured dosing schedules and I'm delighted to now be back in the pinning saddle, if much to my thighs' chagrin.

Anyway, enough of my story, Chris Duffin has something to add to this conversation that I think is worthy of this community's broader consideration. I had no experience of this gentleman before I invested 15 minutes or so to run his thesis through my lizard brain. I'll give a couple of his key points to both save time and provoke anyone who might be inclined to check out the full length video to do so:

quoted said:
Instead of debating theory, I ran the test. I reconstituted GLOW and KLOW blends, stored them refrigerated for 30 days under real-world conditions, and sent them to a lab for chromatography testing before and after storage. Measured purity. Measured degradation. No speculation. Before storage: 99.5% purity. After 30 days refrigerated: 99.6% purity. Zero degradation.

So there is the windup and the pitch, but there is much more value to the discussion than just the bottom line, in my view. He also makes the point that a lot of these peptide debates online generate more heat than light, a view that I also share. So feel free to watch the video and put forward your infinite wisdom about the matter in the comment section below the fold:

As usual, he's selling some stuff too. I have no knowledge of the quality of his products or services, but I am interested in what all you peptide wizards have to say about the video and his thesis. Thanks for keeping it non-violent.
 
Couple things to note here... Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer is not a medical doctor, he is a chiropractor. He's also had a history of committing fraud (Google it). He talks really fast but at the end of the day he's just trying to sell you something.

I just found out my cousin-in-law is paying him $10k/year for his "black card" program (he says it's a deal because it's normally $25k/year!). He's got him on the most basic GLOW + Reta + MOTS-C protocol I've ever seen in my life. I told him that he's getting fleeced and he could easily find these protocols with a quick Google search.

As far as mixing the peptides, there's already a chart floating around of what should and shouldn't be mixed. GLOW, as you mentioned, is good to go. Chart attached for anyone who wants to check it out.
 
Camlbacker said:
Like many of you, I've been watching the whole back and forth on social media about whether it's self-defeating to use a GLOW or KLOW blend versus pinning the individual peps. The great peptide guru Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer says you have to do one at a time, others say GLOW and KLOW are just fine. An argument can certainly be made for the dosing of GLOW and KLOW not being ideal for a highly individualized program; as I've been researching KLOW these last few weeks, I've come to respect this view, while also being ravenously desirous of not feeling like a human pin cushion day after fucking day. Injection fatigue is a thing, as many of us have come to know. I took a week off to wash out while traveling recently only to realize that, while the places I normally stick needles felt better, in general I've been happier and more enlightened when I was adhering to structured dosing schedules and I'm delighted to now be back in the pinning saddle, if much to my thighs' chagrin.

Anyway, enough of my story, Chris Duffin has something to add to this conversation that I think is worthy of this community's broader consideration. I had no experience of this gentleman before I invested 15 minutes or so to run his thesis through my lizard brain. I'll give a couple of his key points to both save time and provoke anyone who might be inclined to check out the full length video to do so:

So there is the windup and the pitch, but there is much more value to the discussion than just the bottom line, in my view. He also makes the point that a lot of these peptide debates online generate more heat than light, a view that I also share. So feel free to watch the video and put forward your infinite wisdom about the matter in the comment section below the fold:

As usual, he's selling some stuff too. I have no knowledge of the quality of his products or services, but I am interested in what all you peptide wizards have to say about the video and his thesis. Thanks for keeping it non-violent.
He shows you the proof in that video, what more do you need?
 
Camlbacker said:
Like many of you, I've been watching the whole back and forth on social media about whether it's self-defeating to use a GLOW or KLOW blend versus pinning the individual peps. The great peptide guru Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer says you have to do one at a time, others say GLOW and KLOW are just fine. An argument can certainly be made for the dosing of GLOW and KLOW not being ideal for a highly individualized program; as I've been researching KLOW these last few weeks, I've come to respect this view, while also being ravenously desirous of not feeling like a human pin cushion day after fucking day. Injection fatigue is a thing, as many of us have come to know. I took a week off to wash out while traveling recently only to realize that, while the places I normally stick needles felt better, in general I've been happier and more enlightened when I was adhering to structured dosing schedules and I'm delighted to now be back in the pinning saddle, if much to my thighs' chagrin.

Anyway, enough of my story, Chris Duffin has something to add to this conversation that I think is worthy of this community's broader consideration. I had no experience of this gentleman before I invested 15 minutes or so to run his thesis through my lizard brain. I'll give a couple of his key points to both save time and provoke anyone who might be inclined to check out the full length video to do so:

So there is the windup and the pitch, but there is much more value to the discussion than just the bottom line, in my view. He also makes the point that a lot of these peptide debates online generate more heat than light, a view that I also share. So feel free to watch the video and put forward your infinite wisdom about the matter in the comment section below the fold:

As usual, he's selling some stuff too. I have no knowledge of the quality of his products or services, but I am interested in what all you peptide wizards have to say about the video and his thesis. Thanks for keeping it non-violent.

Purity of a blend is sketchy as a concept. But you can look at loss of mass over a 30 day of this blend to see how much of it is lost to degradation.
 
spicychickentoospicy said:
Couple things to note here... Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer is not a medical doctor, he is a chiropractor. He's also had a history of committing fraud (Google it). He talks really fast but at the end of the day he's just trying to sell you something.

I just found out my cousin-in-law is paying him $10k/year for his "black card" program (he says it's a deal because it's normally $25k/year!). He's got him on the most basic GLOW + Reta + MOTS-C protocol I've ever seen in my life. I told him that he's getting fleeced and he could easily find these protocols with a quick Google search.

As far as mixing the peptides, there's already a chart floating around of what should and shouldn't be mixed. GLOW, as you mentioned, is good to go. Chart attached for anyone who wants to check it out.

Habibibi said:
Purity of a blend is sketchy as a concept. But you can look at loss of mass over a 30 day of this blend to see how much of it is lost to degradation.
Most are 30 day use, I don't see any issue
 
spicychickentoospicy said:
I just found out my cousin-in-law is paying him $10k/year for his "black card" program
It's scary what a beard and a lot of confidence can do to people
 
Camlbacker said:
Like many of you, I've been watching the whole back and forth on social media about whether it's self-defeating to use a GLOW or KLOW blend versus pinning the individual peps. The great peptide guru Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer says you have to do one at a time, others say GLOW and KLOW are just fine. An argument can certainly be made for the dosing of GLOW and KLOW not being ideal for a highly individualized program; as I've been researching KLOW these last few weeks, I've come to respect this view, while also being ravenously desirous of not feeling like a human pin cushion day after fucking day. Injection fatigue is a thing, as many of us have come to know. I took a week off to wash out while traveling recently only to realize that, while the places I normally stick needles felt better, in general I've been happier and more enlightened when I was adhering to structured dosing schedules and I'm delighted to now be back in the pinning saddle, if much to my thighs' chagrin.

Anyway, enough of my story, Chris Duffin has something to add to this conversation that I think is worthy of this community's broader consideration. I had no experience of this gentleman before I invested 15 minutes or so to run his thesis through my lizard brain. I'll give a couple of his key points to both save time and provoke anyone who might be inclined to check out the full length video to do so:

So there is the windup and the pitch, but there is much more value to the discussion than just the bottom line, in my view. He also makes the point that a lot of these peptide debates online generate more heat than light, a view that I also share. So feel free to watch the video and put forward your infinite wisdom about the matter in the comment section below the fold:

As usual, he's selling some stuff too. I have no knowledge of the quality of his products or services, but I am interested in what all you peptide wizards have to say about the video and his thesis. Thanks for keeping it non-violent.

Purity of a blend is sketchy as a concept. But you can look at loss of mass over a 30 day of this blend to see how much of it is lost to degradation.
 
I watched the video. The proof tests that he shows are from separate batches. As a matter of fact, his before image is glow and his after image is klow. And both dated the same. Am I misunderstanding him or is he full of it?
 
spicychickentoospicy said:
Couple things to note here... Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer is not a medical doctor, he is a chiropractor. He's also had a history of committing fraud (Google it). He talks really fast but at the end of the day he's just trying to sell you something.

I just found out my cousin-in-law is paying him $10k/year for his "black card" program (he says it's a deal because it's normally $25k/year!). He's got him on the most basic GLOW + Reta + MOTS-C protocol I've ever seen in my life. I told him that he's getting fleeced and he could easily find these protocols with a quick Google search.

As far as mixing the peptides, there's already a chart floating around of what should and shouldn't be mixed. GLOW, as you mentioned, is good to go. Chart attached for anyone who wants to check it out.
I was watching one of his videos the other day, he seems very full of himself. And the $25K/yr is the cheap package. If you want 1 on 1 counseling, $250K and he says it should be more, and he has a waiting list. Um, hard pass.
 
I am trying to think of what it would take to get me to voluntarily sit still and be talked at for fifteen goddamn minutes by a peptide bro with a beard. I would have to be SO sure that he had the cure for cancer and would only tell me if I let him talk at me for fifteen goddamn minutes.
 
spicychickentoospicy said:
Couple things to note here... Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer is not a medical doctor, he is a chiropractor. He's also had a history of committing fraud (Google it). He talks really fast but at the end of the day he's just trying to sell you something.

I just found out my cousin-in-law is paying him $10k/year for his "black card" program (he says it's a deal because it's normally $25k/year!). He's got him on the most basic GLOW + Reta + MOTS-C protocol I've ever seen in my life. I told him that he's getting fleeced and he could easily find these protocols with a quick Google search.

As far as mixing the peptides, there's already a chart floating around of what should and shouldn't be mixed. GLOW, as you mentioned, is good to go. Chart attached for anyone who wants to check it out.
Do you mean "mixing in a single injection/vial"? According to that chart, the GLP1s should not be "mixed" with anything. Do you know what that means? Thanks.
 
QueenMuntha said:
Do you mean "mixing in a single injection/vial"? According to that chart, the GLP1s should not be "mixed" with anything. Do you know what that means? Thanks.
Looks like that.... mixing glp1 with another glp1 shows a gray box.... so unstudied or unknown. I mix reta with sema in the same syringe.
 
spicychickentoospicy said:
Couple things to note here... Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer is not a medical doctor, he is a chiropractor. He's also had a history of committing fraud (Google it). He talks really fast but at the end of the day he's just trying to sell you something.

I just found out my cousin-in-law is paying him $10k/year for his "black card" program (he says it's a deal because it's normally $25k/year!). He's got him on the most basic GLOW + Reta + MOTS-C protocol I've ever seen in my life. I told him that he's getting fleeced and he could easily find these protocols with a quick Google search.

As far as mixing the peptides, there's already a chart floating around of what should and shouldn't be mixed. GLOW, as you mentioned, is good to go. Chart attached for anyone who wants to check it out.
Bachmeyer is the twinkie who thinks reta MUST have carbs for it to work. We are (my wife and I) proof positive that strict carnivores will also benefit from Reta and a NO CARB diet still gets GREAT results. As for his 'Fleecium Black Card' program", is your cousin perhaps looking for real estate? I have a few bridges in new York to sell, CHEAP at $1.4 billion off the MSRP!
 
Camlbacker said:
Like many of you, I've been watching the whole back and forth on social media about whether it's self-defeating to use a GLOW or KLOW blend versus pinning the individual peps. The great peptide guru Dr. Trevor Bachmeyer says you have to do one at a time, others say GLOW and KLOW are just fine. An argument can certainly be made for the dosing of GLOW and KLOW not being ideal for a highly individualized program; as I've been researching KLOW these last few weeks, I've come to respect this view, while also being ravenously desirous of not feeling like a human pin cushion day after fucking day. Injection fatigue is a thing, as many of us have come to know. I took a week off to wash out while traveling recently only to realize that, while the places I normally stick needles felt better, in general I've been happier and more enlightened when I was adhering to structured dosing schedules and I'm delighted to now be back in the pinning saddle, if much to my thighs' chagrin.

Anyway, enough of my story, Chris Duffin has something to add to this conversation that I think is worthy of this community's broader consideration. I had no experience of this gentleman before I invested 15 minutes or so to run his thesis through my lizard brain. I'll give a couple of his key points to both save time and provoke anyone who might be inclined to check out the full length video to do so:

So there is the windup and the pitch, but there is much more value to the discussion than just the bottom line, in my view. He also makes the point that a lot of these peptide debates online generate more heat than light, a view that I also share. So feel free to watch the video and put forward your infinite wisdom about the matter in the comment section below the fold:

As usual, he's selling some stuff too. I have no knowledge of the quality of his products or services, but I am interested in what all you peptide wizards have to say about the video and his thesis. Thanks for keeping it non-violent.
I cannot fathom anyone believing a word this guy says..
 
I am not sure I have yet seen a youtube video with good medical information, I am sure there must be some out there, and I may be biased or bigoted based on looks but I would just never watch a video with that thumbnail. It screams untrustworthy source of information to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,620
Messages
55,146
Members
1
Latest member
Admin
Back
Top