stoked12 said:IMO GLP1 drugs are "Glp1 replacement therapy" or "Incretin replacement therapy"
To many people views these compounds as a "get skinny quick pill", I think the above terms would help average people better understand these compounds AND why they exist.
Just like "Testosterone replacement therapy" sounds better then telling someone your taking Testosterone.
Idk just some thoughts.
I usually tell my gym bros I'm supplementing with "T" — "Testosterone Replacement Therapy" is too many words. Just kidding, I'm not on T. Yet.
But that's actually a useful analogy for why "replacement therapy" doesn't quite fit here.
With TRT, you're restoring a hormone the body genuinely can't produce in adequate amounts. That's not what's happening with GLP-1 agonists. Most people with obesity don't have a GLP-1 deficiency — and as @woundcarping noted, the dosing is supraphysiologic anyway. The deeper issue is that native GLP-1 has an extremely short half-life (minutes, not days) because it's designed to be a brief postprandial signal. These drugs don't replace deficient GLP-1; they engineer an entirely different pharmacokinetic profile — one that converts a transient pulse into a week-long continuous signal at levels the body never naturally produces. That's not replacement therapy. That's something new.

