
The other thing that is repeated is just follow the trial dosing schedule which doesn't necessarily make sense. They are not using that schedule becuse its optimal, they have no idea what optimal is. They have to guess and use it on a one size fits all basis. We are at the beginning stages of figuring out optimal doses.lessthanhalf said:And I think the very consistent repetition of the low and slow mantra does tend to make it stick in peoples heads, so even if people have 50 or 100 kilos to lose, they often seem to want to try sticking to unrealistically low doses, and then get confused as to why it is not really working.
I think with any drug, lowest effective does is always the best strategy. There is a saying 'if it doesn't have side effects its probably not doing anything'. There is always a downside. It may be higher risk of a rare issue, it may be more cardiovascular stress, or it may be a ton of other things. The key word is effective. If its doing what you need to do, don't increase just to increase. If you are seeing a decrease in effectiveness, thats the time to increase. Its also not a race. Faster isn't necessarily better, its just faster.
