Looks like Novo is hurting

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am a bit surprised that semaglutide is still fairly popular. Given it is not cheaper, is both less effective at weight loss and has more side effects than tirzepatide, it is really hard to think of a good reason for starting anyone on it in preference to tirz. It has more accumulated evidence for benefits outside of weight loss - for cardiovascular and kidney risks etc, but all the research on tirz so far strongly suggests it is a class effect and is very likely to be the same. Obviously if someone is already on it and it is working for obesity or diabetes switching makes little sense, but retaining old patients is not going to help their share price much.

Unfortunately for novo, lily just picked better drugs to develop or was luckier. Cagri was pretty disappointing for weight loss on its own, and combined with sema is nearly as good as tirz but with more side effects, and both oral ozempic and orfoglipron are also less effective and have more side effects than tirz. Cagri looks good as an add on to reta or tirz at low doses but given the different ownership , not likely to even get studies. Oral ozempic never got promoted much and was not released everywhere, it definitely is not available in Aus, maybe due to initial production limitations so they focused on the injectable version? Orfoglipron could end up popular if people want to avoid injections, I wonder if ozempic being around for so long and being talked about so much has reduced peoples' aversion to injectable drugs a bit?

Unless novo can get their triple agonist out before reta which seems very unlikely then it is just going to get worse for them once reta is available, putting sema at the third ranked choice at best. In the longer term sema is going to end up as the cheaper less preferable option to stay in the market at all, especially once more and more drugs start being approved. In the grey market I cannot think of any reason to use sema, except maybe as a low dose add on to higher doses of reta or tirz.
 
Let’s not forget that without the here pharma companies we wouldn’t have these wonderful drugs to help us be slim. Problem is they get too greedy and want more and more
 
lessthanhalf said:
I am a bit surprised that semaglutide is still fairly popular. Given it is not cheaper, is both less effective at weight loss and has more side effects than tirzepatide, it is really hard to think of a good reason for starting anyone on it in preference to tirz. It has more accumulated evidence for benefits outside of weight loss - for cardiovascular and kidney risks etc, but all the research on tirz so far strongly suggests it is a class effect and is very likely to be the same. Obviously if someone is already on it and it is working for obesity or diabetes switching makes little sense, but retaining old patients is not going to help their share price much.

Unfortunately for novo, lily just picked better drugs to develop or was luckier. Cagri was pretty disappointing for weight loss on its own, and combined with sema is nearly as good as tirz but with more side effects, and both oral ozempic and orfoglipron are also less effective and have more side effects than tirz. Cagri looks good as an add on to reta or tirz at low doses but given the different ownership , not likely to even get studies. Oral ozempic never got promoted much and was not released everywhere, it definitely is not available in Aus, maybe due to initial production limitations so they focused on the injectable version? Orfoglipron could end up popular if people want to avoid injections, I wonder if ozempic being around for so long and being talked about so much has reduced peoples' aversion to injectable drugs a bit?

Unless novo can get their triple agonist out before reta which seems very unlikely then it is just going to get worse for them once reta is available, putting sema at the third ranked choice at best. In the longer term sema is going to end up as the cheaper less preferable option to stay in the market at all, especially once more and more drugs start being approved. In the grey market I cannot think of any reason to use sema, except maybe as a low dose add on to higher doses of reta or tirz.
Novo weight-loss drug may preserve lean body mass better than Lilly's, study finds​[archived internal link]
By Nancy Lapid Reuters - 17 minutes ago

* GLP-1 drugs yielding greater weight loss have worse effects on lean body mass

* Patients on tirzepatide lost more muscle and other non-fat tissues than patients on semaglutide

* Exercise during treatment is essential with both drugs, researchers say

April 16 (Reuters) - Eli Lilly's ( LLY ) GLP-1 drugtirzepatide yields greater weight loss on average than NovoNordisk's semaglutide, but at a greater expense tomuscles and connective tissues, according to a study publishedthis week ahead of peer review.

Tirzepatide, sold as Zepbound and Mounjaro, and semaglutide,under the brand names Wegovy and Ozempic, have become wildlypopular for weight loss and have demonstrated other healthbenefits, such as heart-protective properties. But there has been concern that they induce loss of muscle and other components of lean body mass along with fat.

The researchers analyzed data on roughly 1,800 patients using tirzepatide and 6,200 using semaglutide.

Tirzepatide was consistently associated with greater loss of lean body mass than semaglutide. Tirzepatide patients lost an average of 1.1% more lean body mass after three months and 2%after 12 months of continuous use, the analysis by Massachusetts-based data analytics firm, nference, found.

"This suggests that patients shouldn't simplistically be thinking, 'I want to lose X amount of weight and I'll go with the option that delivers greater weight loss,'" said study leader Venky Soundararajan of nference on the study data published online.

Patients were tracked before and during treatment either with low-radiation scans or with "smart" scales that estimate body fat percentage, muscle mass, bone mass, and other components.

The study cannot explain why lean body mass loss was greater with tirzepatide, which mimics the hormones GLP-1 and GIP, compared with semaglutide, which only mimics GLP-1. Mimicking the hormones slows digestion and makes patients feel full.

A Novo spokesperson did not comment on the current study, but said changes in muscle mass did not significantly differ between semaglutide and placebo groups in clinical trials, and physical function was preserved.

A Lilly spokesperson said fat loss achieved with healthy dieting is similarly accompanied by lean body mass loss.

In its late-stage clinical trial, "the ratio of fat-mass loss to lean-mass loss for patients treated with tirzepatide was generally consistent with that reported in lifestyle-based treatments for obesity," the spokesperson said.

STUDY DETAILS

Roughly 10% of tirzepatide users who lost more than 20% oftheir total body weight were found to have lost more than 5% of their lean body mass. That was true for fewer than 7% of semaglutide users who lost the same percentage of body weight.

Decreased exercise tolerance during treatment was linked with greater lean body mass loss in both groups, but to a greater extent in tirzepatide-treated patients.

Higher doses, longer treatment, and the presence of musculoskeletal pain before treatment began were also associatedwith greater lean body mass decline with both drugs, theresearchers found.

"It's a vicious cycle," Soundararajan said. "If you start with a drug which puts you at a greater probability of lean body mass loss... and you have a preexisting history of musculoskeletal diseases, it puts you at greater risk of lower tolerance to exercise. And if you're not exercising when you're on these medicines, you are essentially causing attrition of lean body mass."

nference funding comes from health systems, institutional investors, and venture capital firms.(Reporting by Nancy Lapid; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Bill Berkrot)
 
quoted said:
It turns out orforglipron isn’t as effective as hoped.

Click to expand...

I feel like anything that's a pill will still be widely prescribed. So many doctors treat their patients like they are too stupid to give themselves injections. Many of them are still prescribing older drugs that have absolutely pathetic results even in the best trials. It also seems that many people have lost the capability to learn how to do new or "hard" things like giving themselves shots. So can't completely blame the doctors but so few give any option past their preferred med.
 
CathyGoesFar said:
I feel like anything that's a pill will still be widely prescribed. So many doctors treat their patients like they are too stupid to give themselves injections. Many of them are still prescribing older drugs that have absolutely pathetic results even in the best trials. It also seems that many people have lost the capability to learn how to do new or "hard" things like giving themselves shots. So can't completely blame the doctors but so few give any option past their preferred med.
Some patients are too stupid and too lazy (add in too fearful) to give themselves an injection. PBMs will still design formularies to dispense the cheapest medication first. Insurers & employers will still limit accessibility to manage down premiums.
 
Turbo-Farmer said:
EL bought the process from Genentech, who developed the first synthetic insulin product which was manufactured using recombinant DNA inserted into e.coli and fermented.

I worked for Genentech (2007) when one of my coworkers was stealing HGH from the clinical production line and selling it at his brother’s bodybuilding store. At the time it was one of the largest bust of the sales of steroids.

https://www.mercurynews.com/2007/09...man-growth-hormone-sold-it-in-san-jose-store/
he didn't happen to work in/run IT, be tall, runner's slender, live on Lombard, and be from CA (the country), did he?

just askin' just totally rando questions. heh. cause why would he be on the production line, right?

Can't read the article.
 
fetefille said:
he didn't happen to work in/run IT, be tall, runner's slender, live on Lombard, and be from CA (the country), did he?

just askin' just totally rando questions. heh. cause why would he be on the production line, right?

Can't read the article.
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2007/09/25/steroid-sting-nabs-bay-area-brothers/amp/

See if this link works better

he actually worked in clinical manufacturing/pilot plant
 
Tbagger said:
Novo’s stock is falling while its profits and projected growth tank.

It turns out orforglipron isn’t as effective as hoped. Combined with the fact Tirz is more effective and that they can’t stop the flood of grey market and compounded Sema, they are bleeding money. I won’t be shedding any tears if those greedy bastards go under.

The Creator of Ozempic Is in Terrible Trouble

Ozempic manufacturer Novo Nordisk slashed its sales forecast and saw its value plunge by nearly $100 billion.

futurism.com
I'm sure they will weather the storm having gross revenues higher than there countries gdp
 
Turbo-Farmer said:
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2007/09/25/steroid-sting-nabs-bay-area-brothers/amp/

See if this link works better

he actually worked in clinical manufacturing/pilot plant
thank you and whew
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,620
Messages
55,146
Members
1
Latest member
Admin
Back
Top