What do you think you spend per month on peptides?
- Thread starter Wallydog
- Start date
- Status
Yeah thanks for that guys. It got me to add up what I have spent since last July and it came to a bit over $6000 Aud, or a bit over $4000 usd . That was a quite a lot more than I thought.
When I get my last order soon I should have at least 5 years of reta 1500mg and tirz 2800mg at current doses. Still do not feel anywhere near safe with only 5 years. I am genuinely terrified of not being able to access them in the future and trying to keep off more than half my body weight without GLP support would not be a lot of fun. Also have a year or so of adamax and hgh and some mots-c and cagri in case I need it and one lot of semaglutide in case I wanted to add low doses to a mix. And a bit of oxytocin and selank for experimenting with. And yes I am a bit hypocritical as some of these do not have human clinical trial evidence for safety of efficacy.
But I was spending $1750 aud / year on ozempic before that and one horrible purchase of legit tirzepatide for $690 to see if I could get it to last 4 months or so, which turned out to be a miscalculation. So apart from spending a lot up front for 5 years worth it is still actually cheaper than legit ozempic, which at low doses in Aus is very cheap by most standards at $145/month for 1mg/week. And the other peptides are good for amusement value and might even help.
I do think China will crack down on the peptide sellers eventually but there is no way of knowing when or how severely, or if they could succeed in stopping them altogether, or just in making it harder to get and more expensive.
Australia will end up subsidising GLP's eventually, they already do for diabetics and have started to do it for semaglutide but only if obese and you have already had a heart attack or stroke, but it will happen very slowly and with a lot of restrictions and requirements to keep costs sort of under control.
When I get my last order soon I should have at least 5 years of reta 1500mg and tirz 2800mg at current doses. Still do not feel anywhere near safe with only 5 years. I am genuinely terrified of not being able to access them in the future and trying to keep off more than half my body weight without GLP support would not be a lot of fun. Also have a year or so of adamax and hgh and some mots-c and cagri in case I need it and one lot of semaglutide in case I wanted to add low doses to a mix. And a bit of oxytocin and selank for experimenting with. And yes I am a bit hypocritical as some of these do not have human clinical trial evidence for safety of efficacy.
But I was spending $1750 aud / year on ozempic before that and one horrible purchase of legit tirzepatide for $690 to see if I could get it to last 4 months or so, which turned out to be a miscalculation. So apart from spending a lot up front for 5 years worth it is still actually cheaper than legit ozempic, which at low doses in Aus is very cheap by most standards at $145/month for 1mg/week. And the other peptides are good for amusement value and might even help.
I do think China will crack down on the peptide sellers eventually but there is no way of knowing when or how severely, or if they could succeed in stopping them altogether, or just in making it harder to get and more expensive.
Australia will end up subsidising GLP's eventually, they already do for diabetics and have started to do it for semaglutide but only if obese and you have already had a heart attack or stroke, but it will happen very slowly and with a lot of restrictions and requirements to keep costs sort of under control.
I like that idea. On COA’s how far back dated are still considered legit. For example is a COA dated 3-4 months ago something reasonable? I’ve been learning a lot on this forum and truely appreciate any inputGrogu said:
Thanks
Do you mind telling me more about how you like the Adamax?lessthanhalf said:
Figis1badcat said:I like that idea. On COA’s how far back dated are still considered legit. For example is a COA dated 3-4 months ago something reasonable? I’ve been learning a lot on this forum and truely appreciate any input
Thanks
A COA is for specific vial(s) tested out of a particular batch. A 3 or 4 month old COA is no guarantee that what you’re purchasing today is from that same batch, most likely not.
That doesn’t mean old COAs from a particular vendor are useless. Looking at old COAs of a particular vendor may provide some assurance over time that the vendor’s products test well. But still no guarantees.
The QR Code that I put on the labels is for the COA for the particular batch that the vials came from. Even still, lots of holes. I don’t recall if I donate a vial to the test group, so the vials tested might not be representative of the vials that I purchased. For example, the vendor cold have supplied orders around the same time from different batches.
Whatever it is, it's less than all the junk food/drinks I used to buy pre-reta. I also don't do any kind of shopping at all, as I just don't get the same dopamine hit anymore. I'm pretty sure I'm net positive when all things are taken into consideration.
- Status
