Reliable method to reconstitute SLU-PP-332?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Medex 35307

GLP-1 Novice 🚫No Source Discussion🚫
Member Since
Feb 3, 2026
Posts
22
Likes Received
16
Location
US
Does anyone here have experience reconstituting SLU-PP-332 for subq? I ordered a kit without researching first, and now understand that it's hydrophobic, which means BAC water alone will just ruin it.

I watched a few YouTube vids that use .5ml DMSO then an equal amount of BAC water to reconstitute it, but everything I've read says this is a horrible idea, that injecting that concentration of DSMO is pretty toxic. I've read a couple sources that state using DMSO first, then PSB 80(tween 80), then phosphate buffered saline, in order to get the DSMO down to 1%, or close to 1%.

Anyone? Thanks for any help, and go ahead and laugh as necessary.
 
Medex said:
Does anyone here have experience reconstituting SLU-PP-332 for subq? I ordered a kit without researching first, and now understand that it's hydrophobic, which means BAC water alone will just ruin it.

I watched a few YouTube vids that use .5ml DMSO then an equal amount of BAC water to reconstitute it, but everything I've read says this is a horrible idea, that injecting that concentration of DSMO is pretty toxic. I've read a couple sources that state using DMSO first, then PSB 80(tween 80), then phosphate buffered saline, in order to get the DSMO down to 1%, or close to 1%.

Anyone? Thanks for any help, and go ahead and laugh as necessary.
I know, I know, literally no one. But anyways, without linking to anywhere that wouldn't want association with self-described 'researchers,' I did finally stumble across this:

"Try to dissolve very hydrophobic peptides in a small amount of DMSO (30–50 μl, 100%), and then slowly add the solution dropwise to a stirring aqueous buffered solution such as PBS (or your desired buffer) to the required concentration. If the resulting peptide solution begins to show [cloudiness]turbidity, you have reached the limit of solubility. Sonication will help dissolve the peptides.

Rule of thumb:

0.1% DMSO is considered to be safe for almost all cells.

A final concentration of 0.5% DMSO is used widely for cell culture without cytotoxicity.

1% DMSO does not cause any toxicity in some cells, but 0.5% DMSO is recommended.

5% DMSO was used successfully in some cells."

Um, Still searching...
 
Medex said:
Does anyone here have experience reconstituting SLU-PP-332 for subq? I ordered a kit without researching first, and now understand that it's hydrophobic, which means BAC water alone will just ruin it.

I watched a few YouTube vids that use .5ml DMSO then an equal amount of BAC water to reconstitute it, but everything I've read says this is a horrible idea, that injecting that concentration of DSMO is pretty toxic. I've read a couple sources that state using DMSO first, then PSB 80(tween 80), then phosphate buffered saline, in order to get the DSMO down to 1%, or close to 1%.

Anyone? Thanks for any help, and go ahead and laugh as necessary.
That's one of the reasons that I went with capsules. I don't know if they are better worse, however they are easier.
 
ive read that some people have used 0.2mL or 0.3mL of DMSO to 2.3mL or 2.2mL of BAC with good results too

I guess you could use more BAC to reduce the DMSO concentration?
 
I was considering whether this would waste a vial or not. Now I'll have to give it a try! Is there any way you could message me the links to where you read that? Thank you
 
Medex said:
I was considering whether this would waste a vial or not. Now I'll have to give it a try! Is there any way you could message me the links to where you read that? Thank you
I’ve since lost where I read it, it was amongst my late night searches somewhere, im going to give it a try as well
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,620
Messages
55,146
Members
1
Latest member
Admin
Back
Top