Pre filling glp1 syringe

Status
Not open for further replies.
scarywood75 said:
It's funny that you ask me to browbeat people because you are doing it too,
i'm asking you NOT to browbeat people. is English your second language?

scarywood75 said:
Your take is that; it's already risky so a bit more risk is fine?
its NOT a risk. but you want to take on everyone here and go on and on.
 
I'm not sure what the benefit would be? Is there a reason someone would want to do it? Isn't just using a pen easier? You fill it once and can just jab yourself standing next to the fridge and put it back.
 
chmuse said:
I'm not sure what the benefit would be? Is there a reason someone would want to do it? Isn't just using a pen easier? You fill it once and can just jab yourself standing next to the fridge and put it back.
OMG! Crypto Doser stuck! 🤣
 
raw_oyster_eater said:
i'm asking you NOT to browbeat people. is English your second language?

its NOT a risk. but you want to take on everyone here and go on and on.
If it's not a risk, why would there be strict USP guidelines around that?

Yeah my English sucks lol
 
scarywood75 said:
If it's not a risk, why would there be strict USP guidelines around that?

Yeah my English sucks lol

You're canadian- is French your first language? (Not being snarky, your English is just fine. It's pretty damn good if English is indeed not your first language.)
 
chmuse said:
You're canadian- is French your first language? (Not being snarky, your English is just fine. It's pretty damn good if English is indeed not your first language.)
Yes you got it, Canadian french aha
 
tul9033 said:
Can't help but shake my head. This is getting ridiculous. I'm going to have to ignore this thread so I don't go unhinged.

YOU'RE INJECTING AN UNKNOWN SUBSTANCE IN YOUR BODY FROM BLACK MARKET CHINA AND YOU WAN'T TO TALK ABOUT HARM REDUCTION!?
Yes.

This is why it is called 'harm reduction' not 'harm prevention.'

Everyone is entitled to make their own choices and determine their own risk tolerance but part and parcel of most communities like this is discussion on how to minimize all of the risks we can.
 
hexagonal said:
Yes.

This is why it is called 'harm reduction' not 'harm prevention.'

Everyone is entitled to make their own choices and determine their own risk tolerance but part and parcel of most communities like this is discussion on how to minimize all of the risks we can.
I agree. None of us (or at least few of us) are actually trying to harm ourselves. We're generally trying to improve ourselves. We do take measures, such as researching vendors and following good reconstitution technique, to reduce harm.
 
hexagonal said:
Yes.

This is why it is called 'harm reduction' not 'harm prevention.'

Everyone is entitled to make their own choices and determine their own risk tolerance but part and parcel of most communities like this is discussion on how to minimize all of the risks we can.

keangkong said:
I agree. None of us (or at least few of us) are actually trying to harm ourselves. We're generally trying to improve ourselves. We do take measures, such as researching vendors and following good reconstitution technique, to reduce harm.
Yes, but in the context of prefilling a sterile syringe being more harmful than injecting Chinese peptides... No
 
It is only sterile until you open the needle. Then sterility is unknown
 
tul9033 said:
Yes, but in the context of prefilling a sterile syringe being more harmful than injecting Chinese peptides... No
It is no longer considered sterile at that point.

I prefill syringes sometimes, but never for use over an extended period of time.
 
stickfigure said:
It is only sterile until you open the needle. Then sterility is unknown

hexagonal said:
It is no longer considered sterile at that point.

I prefill syringes sometimes, but never for use over an extended period of time.
When is the peptide sterile?
 
stickfigure said:
When you pass it through 0.22um or better filter.
I can keep playing the game. And the filter is sterile when?
 
When it comes sealed from manufacturer. The business end of filter (opposite from syringe) remains sterile, since bacteria and spores can't get through the filter.

You didn't seem to be looking for any information, you made up your mind and not looking for any other opinions other than confirming your plan. Not sure why you even bother posting here
 
stickfigure said:
When it comes sealed from manufacturer. The business end of filter (opposite from syringe) remains sterile, since bacteria and spores can't get through the filter.

You didn't seem to be looking for any information, you made up your mind and not looking for any other opinions other than confirming your plan. Not sure why you even bother posting here
So the syringe is no longer sterile when opened but the filter "business end" is always sterile. Got it.

I'm extremely pragmatic. The lack of logic and statements of absolutes is mind boggling. I totally accept there is some degree of inherit risk and there are steps to mitigate them in the peptide game, but others want to cherry pick the risks and dismiss the obvious. If having that pointed out bothers you I'm not sure why YOU are posting here.
 
tul9033 said:
Yes, but in the context of prefilling a sterile syringe being more harmful than injecting Chinese peptides... No
But you’re comparing items with dissimilar benefits. As to using Chinese peptides, I have no choice if I want to use Reta. In contrast, I avoid pre filling a syringe because it doesn’t seem to benefit me in anyway and does carry a small amount of additional risk.
 
Ok, you guys have convinced me to be more sterile.

From now on I'm going back to reconstituting with everclear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,620
Messages
55,146
Members
1
Latest member
Admin
Back
Top