例如，如果我要用 3 毫升 BAC 溶液过滤一个 30 毫克的药瓶，我会先用 2 毫升或 2.5 毫升 BAC 溶液冲洗药瓶，然后过滤，再用剩余的 1 毫升或 0.5 毫升 BAC 溶液冲洗到总共 3 毫升，以便将过滤过程中残留在过滤器中的肽冲入药瓶中……我希望如此。或者至少这是我的“策略”。Retazempic said:
吉普车
- Thread starter PunkN
- Start date
- Status
我的运行正常。
如果我理解没错，你服用瑞他莫昔芬（Reta）才3-4周，而且剂量一直不稳定？不，你不应该一下子就服用6毫克。瑞他莫昔芬的半衰期是6天，你需要循序渐进地增加血药浓度才能达到有效水平。Tator said:
如果你需要抑制食欲，可以试试每周两次，每次2毫克。对我来说，每周两次的剂量就很有效。但要注意，由于你没有逐步增加剂量，也没有遵循任何用药规律，这个剂量可能会让你感到不适。
作为参考，我最初是从0.5毫克开始的……我每周注射四次，以维持食欲抑制，这样就达到了每周2毫克的起始剂量，之后我每3-4天注射1毫克。现在进入第五周，我把剂量翻倍，改为每周两次，每次2毫克。
Tator said:
After overshooting and going way too high, I restarted my Reta journey at 4mg, mainly to figure out how to manage my side effects. At that dose, I basically stayed the same weight. At 5mg, same.
At 6mg - for me - I have dropped weight very quickly. YMMV, obviously. I’m 5 4 and weigh(ed) 167 lbs when I went to 6mg. But my experience is consistent with what I’ve been hearing – that for many people 6 mg is when things start to happen. After that, I hear it’s either 8 or 9 mg. I have not looked at any of the titration studies that were conducted. I can only speak regarding this N of 1.
Thats a pretty high dosage. Anything over 2mg for me and I get very cold plus my skin gets very sensitive.Retazempic said:
soesfairview said:
Those were my symptoms when I accidentally took a double dose
Its wild. The more posts I read about people's doses and sides and losses. The less reta makes sense lol.
I think a lot of people enjoy exaggerating and using extreme language when describing the effects of these drugs. Probe their claims a bit and more often than not you'll hear that "an absolutely horrendous anhedonia" was actually them scratching an itchy spot a couple times a day.maven8518 said:
My side effects are some heartburn on pin days. I and my wife are both on 6mg. Not sure how much difference this has made, but we've stuck with Lilly's test schedule. Started 2mg for 4 weeks, then bumped up 2mg every 4 weeks. Everyone is different. YMMVmaven8518 said:
Y'all are filtering that Jeep reta, right?
JEEP Reta 30mg Batch number: JP20250821
Mass and Purity: 33.24mg 99.865%
Janoshik Analytical
Endotoxins: 1.294 EU/Vial
Janoshik Analytical
Sterility: TAMC - FAIL, TYMV - FAIL
Janoshik Analytical
JEEP Reta 30mg Batch number: JP20250821
Mass and Purity: 33.24mg 99.865%
Janoshik Analytical
Endotoxins: 1.294 EU/Vial
Janoshik Analytical
Sterility: TAMC - FAIL, TYMV - FAIL
Janoshik Analytical
So, the TAMC and TYMV means bacterial and fungus contamination?RetCurious said:
Would filtering even remove this?
Newbie here. I know nothing, but am curious; How common and How dangerous?
This was from a local group test I was a part of. The buyer of the batch is eating it sadly. As far as filtering...filtering removes 99.9% supposedly. That's fine for double checking a batch that tested ok or under limits. That's not enough for me with something KNOWN to have crap in it. Of course everyone has their own comfort level.
Note that when filtering....the filters have a limit of the contaminant they can clean. Without knowing how much (janoshik doesn't say) contaminant there is, you can't know whether filtering would possibly mitigate it.
Note that when filtering....the filters have a limit of the contaminant they can clean. Without knowing how much (janoshik doesn't say) contaminant there is, you can't know whether filtering would possibly mitigate it.
Well shit. I have some R20 en routeRetCurious said:
This is a punch to the gut for someone who's been waiting on a Jeep shipment for over 3 weeks. I don't think I'd be confident in taking something that failed sterility like this, even with filtering. Is it really too much to ask for some semblance of safety standards with this stuff?RetCurious said:
Interesting. Here is Jeep's test for that same batch number. https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/80925-R30_8YSG7F76GKG2
…I have 2 kits of this in route ask we speak. Lesson learned. Can’t just go by the mass and purity test COAs..kj4otu said:
I had been waiting for several weeks, also. Sorry this happened to you.RJ760 said:
Low endotoxins would suggest a low level of contamination would it not? I would think this would be good if filtered and used with BAC water. There hasn't been a lot of testing for this until recently, but my suspension is that these results would probably be fairly common in what we have been using. Am I wrong in any of that?RetCurious said:
I think some folks might be ok with the endos, but from what I’ve heard it’s the TAMC and TYVM fails (bacteria, and fungal) that draw the most concern.5byfive said:
Veterans, correct me if I am wrong.
- Status
