The law that I talked only dealt with (1) the distribution of syringes by pharmacists and doctors and (2) the legalization of possession of them without a prescription by users.
I'm aware that the increased money that California has spent on deal with homelessness hasn't done much, if anything, to improve things.
As to non-profit organizations, some are good. Some are bad and actually result in the personal enrichment of others.
About 25 years ago, I represented a client charged with distributing needles as part of a needle exchange program. The client was one of several people charged with violating the law by participating in the program. None made any money from doing so. There was no formal organization. None had any criminal histories. We brought an expert from the CDC, Peter Lurie, MD, currently the head of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, to testify in order to support a necessity defense. Dr. Lurie, who had published on the subject in the British Medical Journal, testified that studies have not been able to detect a link between needle exchange programs and any increase in intravenous drug use. Eventually, before a jury trial could start, the DA agreed that he would dismiss the case if the defendants did not pick up any new criminal cases. The defendants continued to distribute needles. Six months later, the DA dismissed the case. The defendants in that case were all true believers motivated by a desire to do what they believed to be right.
As to deviant sexual acts, I have trouble finding any acts to be deviant if committed by two mentally competent consenting adults in privacy. I'm sure if I worked on hypotheticals enough, I could come up with some act that I find deviant in those circumstances, but I'd have to work to come up with something. As to sex between gay men - and I think that might be what you're referencing - I have no problem with it. I think a much greater problem would be a gay person trying to pretend an attraction to the opposite sex.