In Novo’s Own Words: Degradation of Amylin Analogs Such as Cagrilintide (and How to Test For It)

Status
Not open for further replies.
nurseratchit said:
I think he’s megalith. He’s been busy spreading this 💩 in multiple places.
Yeah, a handful of people still can't tell we have entirely different personalities, but most people have it figured out.
 
nurseratchit said:
I think he’s megalith. He’s been busy spreading this 💩 in multiple places.
I literally just shared direct quotes from Novo Nordisk about their own drug. Which of their statements do you consider 💩?
 
scarywood75 said:
Don't bother making these types of posts here, people are very closed mind as soon as you do things/think differently, even if it's for the better.

I'm a living proof of that too 😂
You had ChatGPT inventing untested ways of reconstitution that didn't involve BAC, and decided to then have it write up a giant guide about how to do it as if it were proven in trials.
 
Dee X said:
You had ChatGPT inventing untested ways of reconstitution that didn't involve BAC, and decided to then have it write up a giant guide about how to do it as if it were proven in trials.
This thread is getting spicy, let's bring some popcorn and watch 👀
 
Yay-Z1 said:
Seems like this is what you and Megalith default to when anyone shares something different from y’all’s view. Have a good day, I had a nice laugh .
Maybe you should stop defaulting to sharing misinformation? 🤔
 
Y

scarywood75 said:
Don't bother making these types of posts here, people are very closed mind as soon as you do things/think differently, even if it's for the better.

I'm a living proof of that too 😂
I’ll admit to being close-minded to fear-mongering AI generated conspiracy propaganda.
 
For the chemistry majors here’s research article about amylin and fibrils. For the TL;DR, yes fibrils were a concern which is why modifications have been made to cagri to suppress fibril development. You can scroll to the summary at the end if chemistry isn’t your thing.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00565
 
You guys and girls had a rough week, it's time to let it all out 😎
 
secretweapon said:
I literally just shared direct quotes from Novo Nordisk about their own drug. Which of their statements do you consider 💩?
You seem to have a weird fibril fetish and are well known for it in the community. I’m pretty sure others have already tried to talk you down so I won’t waste my breath. I will refer you to my previous comment and cited article.
 
nurseratchit said:
You seem to have a weird fibril fetish and are well known for it in the community. I’m pretty sure others have already tried to talk you down so I won’t waste my breath. I will refer you to my previous comment and cited article.
Who are you to judge people's fetishes, I'm sure you have some too 😶‍🌫️
 
scarywood75 said:
Who are you to judge people's fetishes, I'm sure you have some too 😶‍🌫️
I don’t care what anyone else’s fetishes are as long as they don’t try to force it on anyone else.
 
nurseratchit said:
I don’t care what anyone else’s fetishes are as long as they don’t try to force it on anyone else.
Oh yeah I'm sure everyone here really feel forced 🤣
 
penewbie said:
This forum fucking sucks.

And the worst thing of all it's the best GLP1 forum there is.

Fuck.
Hehe, take good informations and just discard the rest, I don't bother sharing anything anymore like a ton of good members here

You gotta think like the rest of them, play along
 
nurseratchit said:
For the chemistry majors here’s research article about amylin and fibrils. For the TL;DR, yes fibrils were a concern which is why modifications have been made to cagri to suppress fibril development. You can scroll to the summary at the end if chemistry isn’t your thing.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00565
I already linked to this article in my original post and heavily quoted from it, as well as several other sister reports from Novo. Clearly you never read my post to begin with if you think your post somehow counters it. 🙃
 
secretweapon said:
I already linked to this article in my original post and heavily quoted from it, as well as several other sister reports from Novo. Clearly you never read my post to begin with if you think your post somehow counters it. 🙃
I admire your persistence sir/mam
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
4,434
Messages
86,405
Members
7,877
Latest member
jhonpdr
Back
Top