
Someone new to another forum was advised to follow this chart for reta. Glad she asked for a second opinion on discord.
Careful where you get your advice folks.
Careful where you get your advice folks.


Those numbers are insaneMr.Tired said:Someone new to another forum was advised to follow this chart for reta. Glad she asked for a second opinion on discord.
Careful where you get your advice folks.
I’m pretty new to researching various versions of glps etc. what would be considered a more widely accepted approach to the numbers?I know my manufacturer is sooo slow it takes a while to get to a therapeutic dose. I assumed it’s part safety but also prob profit driven. Somewhere in the middle is the sweet spot? But also I know less about triple antagonist research and amounts than standard glp alone.Mr.Tired said:Someone new to another forum was advised to follow this chart for reta. Glad she asked for a second opinion on discord.
Careful where you get your advice folks.
I've been looking for a dosing chart that aligns with the medical testing guidelines/results . I thought they would be easier to find . I think the realty is to start as low as possible. And work up as slow as possible.Mr.Tired said:Someone new to another forum was advised to follow this chart for reta. Glad she asked for a second opinion on discord.
Careful where you get your advice folks.

Week 7 they're banging 2ml..... so they'll need a 3cc syringe with a 23 or 25g intramuscular needle. Might as well use that last ml with tren. Unbelievable!Mr.Tired said:Someone new to another forum was advised to follow this chart for reta. Glad she asked for a second opinion on discord.
Careful where you get your advice folks.

The clinical trial included five doses titrating up every four weeks: 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 9 mg and 12 mg.Herslilchunky said:I’m pretty new to researching various versions of glps etc. what would be considered a more widely accepted approach to the numbers?I know my manufacturer is sooo slow it takes a while to get to a therapeutic dose. I assumed it’s part safety but also prob profit driven. Somewhere in the middle is the sweet spot? But also I know less about triple antagonist research and amounts than standard glp alone.
All I can envision is someone running to the bathroom and throwing up! Low and slow is best practice IMO. Increase dose too soon and you can get other unpleasant side effects that didn't plague you before.Mr.Tired said:Someone new to another forum was advised to follow this chart for reta. Glad she asked for a second opinion on discord.
Careful where you get your advice folks.

Why tf do people go outside of trial/clinical doses? I'll never understand this.weightlossking84 said:If you google Eli Lilly phase 3 trials you can find the dosages they use very easily.

Exactly. I would never want to be more aggressive than the recommended dosages. Taking less or increasing slower? Fine. Taking more? Not for me.Sid the SeaGull said:I've been looking for a dosing chart that aligns with the medical testing guidelines/results . I thought they would be easier to find . I think the realty is to start as low as possible. And work up as slow as possible.
Even the medical testing may be a bit high as they will be pushing the boundaries to achieve max results.


I started at 1mg for 4 weeks, and now at 2mg for another 4 weeks. At the end of those 4 weeks I'll determine if I need to go up to 4mg or stay where I'm at depending on results.Herslilchunky said:I’m pretty new to researching various versions of glps etc. what would be considered a more widely accepted approach to the numbers?I know my manufacturer is sooo slow it takes a while to get to a therapeutic dose. I assumed it’s part safety but also prob profit driven. Somewhere in the middle is the sweet spot? But also I know less about triple antagonist research and amounts than standard glp alone.


