Calm Logic said:
Dr. Lee’s “Top 3 Peptides:”
BPC-157 – healing, gut repair, systemic anti-inflammatory.
Thymosin Alpha-1 – immune system support, anti-cancer, anti-viral.
Epitalon – longevity, gene regulation, pineal reset.
View: https://youtu.be/qnnq_-YL8dk?si=z2paSDTQwz9CWZ5j
Attached are lifestyle modifications in place of (or in addition to) taking Epithalon to naturally increase levels of Epithalamin. PDF is by Google Gemini.
I do use the Epitalon reset myself. But the evidence is so thin it is almost non-existent. It has a good safety record, and some mechanistic plausibility, so heck, why not try it? But, no way it should be in the top 3.
Ta1, I agree has a real application for supporting aging. Most seniors have immune decline and once weekly 1.6mg Ta1 can likely help.
BPC-157 is worth considering, but only after a serious discussion around cancer risks. BPC-157 is absolutely contraindicated for active or recent malignancies and is highly cautioned for subjects at elevated cancer risk. Cancer risk increases with age.
KPV is almost a no brainer. It should be in the top 3 for sure. It is gentle, is widely used so we can infer safety, and it really helps with inflammation. Most seniors have inflammation.
I would consider a low dose of Retatrutide unless the subjects are below weight. Most seniors are no below weight. It has all kinds of protective effects, including reducing cholesterol due to glucagon activation; it literally encourages the body to burn lipids.
It isn’t a peptide, but unless contraindicated due to some individual condition, get them on 500 mg of Metformin. It helps stabilize blood sugar and it is an AMPK activator, so it improves mitochondrial function. (Google metformin for longevity and you will find mainstream research.)
And there are some simple supplements that almost every senior should be taking that support metabolism, energy and cognition: Omega-3, NMN, Apigenin, Acetyl‑L‑Carnitine, Beta‑Alanine, and Creatine HCl.
RE the video… it is frustrating as heck that videos and podcasts present information as authoritative when they clearly haven’t even done minimal study.